HAMSIK THE DIFFERENCE FOR SLOVAKIA
Leonid Slutsky looked distressed. His mouth agape, he breathed in and out at rapid pace. He looked on the edge of a heart-attack. Russia, at the time, had control of the game. Aleksandr Kokorin, Oleg Shatov and Fedor Smolov, the attacking trifecta sitting in behind Artem Dzyuba, began opening up the Slovakian back-line on a regular basis; their speed and movement mesmerising Martin Skrtel and Jan Durica. The one thing Russia missed was that clinical edge; that final touch, the one to make the difference.
Marek Hamsik, on the other hand, has that in abundance. He can change a game in a moment; and he did. Slovakia couldn’t keep possession in the Russian half. They lacked the quality; but not Hamsik. The Napoli midfield pivoted in his own-half and cracked an arcing pass that eliminated the entire Russian team and rolled ahead of Vladimir Weiss. One delicate touch killed the pace, and Weiss cut inside, sending a couple of white shirts sliding off the field. He steadied himself and curled a simple shot around the fingertips of Igor Akinfeev.
Slutsky pounded at his legs in rage. Russia had handed Slovakia the lead; in not finishing their chances and in the chaotic defending that let Weiss through.
Hamsik added a second. He received a short corner, cut inside, held off one defender, and then rifled an absolute thunder-bastard into the top corner of the post. The ball smashed off the inside corner and bounced back into the net. Arms outstretched like a Slovakian Jesus, Hamsik walked towards his adoring fans. He made the difference.
His contributions weren’t limited to an assist and a goal. He conducts the orchestra, controlling the ball like a baton, dictating the pace and movements of those around him. It’s his game; the other 21 players are secondary figures. His eye of the needle passes open spaces we can’t see; his shuffles and dribbles create them. If Slovakia are to achieve something in this tournament, it’s going to be all about him.
THE COMAN AND MARTIAL EXPERIMENT
It hadn’t been quite the performance that the French public expected. It was predicted that the hosts, buoyed by the atmosphere inside the Stade de France, would slaughter Romania; an expectation that might not have taken into account the Romanian’s exemplary defensive record in qualification. Instead, France laboured and relied on Dimitri Payet’s genius to sneak a 2-1 win. The public wanted a response. Didier Deschamps responded. The France manager opted for a change in formation; the 4-3-3 out for the popular 4-2-3-1. And he didn’t stop there. Antoine Griezmann and Paul Pogba, two of the players expected to take the tournament by storm, found themselves sat in the evening cold, Anthony Martial and Kingsley Coman in their places.
Pogba could feel hard done by. It hadn’t been a classic performance by the Juventus midfielder, but so much expectation had been put on his still inexperienced shoulders. Could he ever match the hype? Griezmann, however, looked out of place in the opening match. Stuck out on the right, rather than in his preferred central position, he failed to take a real grasp of the game. Neither did their replacements.
Martial received scathing reviews for his performance. The Manchester United striker/winger started out on the right but didn’t last until half-time; Pogba replaced the replacer. Martial made just one forward pass which could be described as ‘attacking’ – seven of his ten successful passes went backwards. He couldn’t muster a single shot on goal nor one successful cross. He was sluggish personified.
Coman looked a little better. France again laboured in the first-half, but if Les Bleus were to create anything, it was going to come through the Bayern winger. In the first couple of minutes he danced through Ermir Lenjani and Ansi Agolli, bursting through into the box before the latter tripped him up. He added some much needed spark.
In the 68th minute Deschamps ended his experiment. Perhaps it had been to test out Coman and Martial; perhaps to warn Pogba and Griezmann that France can’t afford lame performances. The Atletico striker took the lesson to heart. In the 90th minute, the match level and a resilient Albania keeping the hosts at bay, Griezmann snatched at his chance and nodded France in front. It was another dreary performance from Deschamps’ side, but it was another win, and one which guaranteed them progression to the next round.
STURRIDGE CHANGES THE GAME
Jeers and whistles serenaded England as they trudged off the pitch for half-time. Their performance had lethargic, a team lacking ideas and inspiration. Harry Kane, mirroring Romelu Lukaku’s dire showing for Belgium, looked isolated and ineffective; he looks off the pace. Raheem Sterling came in for the most flak, though. It made little sense that the Manchester City winger started his second game running, having struggled against Russia. He came in for a hail-storm of abuse after missing England’s best chance. Adam Lallana darted through the Wales defence and fired a driven cross to the feet of Sterling, who, having the reached the ball at the perfect time and having got their first, managed to scuff the ball over the crossbar. It summed up a dismal 45 minutes for the Three Lions.
That changed at half-time. Roy Hodgson, seeing his England tenure bursting into flames, brought on Daniel Sturridge and Jamie Vardy for Sterling and Kane, and there were immediate improvements. The Liverpool striker, not the out-and-out attacker that the Leicester front-man and Kane are, helped link-up midfield and attack and did an excellent job at finding pockets of space and creating chances. Ten minutes after the restart he flicked a dipping cross into the crowded Wales six-yard-box, where Ashley Williams’ header knocked it towards his own goalkeeper. Vardy pounced. The Red Bull infused striker poked the ball over the line to equalise.
England continued to press but couldn’t find that crucial breakthrough. A resilient Wales refused to crumble. But in the 91st minute, England broke Welsh hearts. Sturridge, lurking on the edge of the box, slipped a quick pass inside to Delle Alli. The Spurs midfielder pushed the ball back through for a one-two, ahead of the charging Sturridge. The Liverpool striker took one touch before knocking past Wayne Hennessey at his near post. He ran off in exhilaration, before composing himself for his trademark dance. One half-assist and one goal – he’d saved England’s Euros.
From this moment it’s clear that the decision lies with Hodgson. England’s dramatic improvement in the second-half centred around Sturridge’s introduction; he offered the creation that Sterling lacked and the danger that Kane couldn’t offer. Yes, he’s sometimes too single-minded – his two long-range shots endangered the England crowd more than the Wales goal – but he has those moments of genius, such as his solo-goal against Sevilla, which can change an entire match. Hodgson needs to utilise him.
IS COUNTER-ATTACK KEY FOR BELGIUM?
Marc Wilmots promised between two and ten changes to the Belgium team that lost 2-0 to Italy. It had been a disjointed and unstructured performance, one which garnered as much flak for the manager as for the players. Belgium’s ‘Golden Generation’ looked anything but. Against a motivated Republic of Ireland, Belgium needed a performance.
Belgium passed and moved with all the flair of Spain. However, there was a glaring difference between the reigning champions and the Red Devils. The Spanish have an almost telepathic understanding, as if all eleven men work as one. It looks seamless. It looks simple. But Belgium prove it’s anything but. They possess the technical skills, but there’s a clear lack of cohesion. Players don’t make the right runs, passes don’t happen at the right time, and, quite often, the moves that do happen prove to be the wrong ones. Too often possession is conceded in a position it shouldn’t be; Spain rarely make that mistake. Belgium look like eleven talented individuals thrown together; a side who could do something, but who lack the understanding, the communication and the rhythm to do so.
Their limp first-half performance against the Irish seemed to confirm that this is an embedded issue; one which might not be solved before the knock-out stages. Yannick Carrasco came in on the right but found himself shackled by the quick-to-close-down Irish – although his placement on that flank meant Kevin de Bruyne could assert more influence in his preferred central role; and Moussa Dembele found himself hooked at the 57 minute mark. Thomas Meunier impressed at right-back, often over-lapping Carrasco and dinking crosses into the box. But, overall, there was little to differentiate this performance from the one that met the Italians. That changed in the second-half.
The Belgians found their key: counter-attack. The problem had been that their tactics revolved around keeping possession and, like the Spanish, passing until a space opened up; counter-attacking let them utilise the pace of Hazard and de Bruyne, and also let them breakthrough a weakened defensive structure. The first goal summed this up. Ireland lost possession from a corner, and, after breaking at pace, Lukaku cut inside before curling the ball around Darren Randolph. The extra space made the difference. A second and third goal followed.